11/4/2023 0 Comments Marine mos 0861![]() There's instances where the ability to drop ordnance is straight-up denied due to risk of collateral damage. Often times, we're not able to use certain munitions/ordnance or have to request certain fusing properties on the ordnance due to risk of collateral damage. ![]() We have to take consider both the ROE (rules of engagement) and collateral damage concerns within our request for CAS to avoid killing/wounding the local populace. The point is that a good CAS pilot in ANY platform will always be better than a bad CAS pilot who conducts CAS in a platform that is more doctrinally orientated towards CAS and their conversation or "vibes" reflect that during the "conversation' of CAS.įorsure! It's often reiterated to us in our training that as JTACs, our theater-level decisions can and WILL have strategic level implications. That's not to say that all Navy Hornet drivers are bad at CAS. I've controlled MQ-9s that have been better in a CAS role, than some Navy F/A-18s. Personally, I feel the difference isn't so much between different aircraft/branches rather between "good" CAS players, and "bad" CAS players. Due to their annoyance at having to adhere to strict final attack headings, and some of our USMC specific CAS rules. There's a lot of "stereotyping" that goes from JTACs, for example it's almost universally joked around by Marine JTACs that having a Hawg check in on station will probably result in a severe headache at best, and severe fratricide at worst. That being said, each community/platform has their own little characteristics that set them apart just a little bit. I have my disagreements with how TACPs employ CAS doctrinally, but they often end up being the service-wide SME's on CAS because of how often they actually get to train and get live controls.Ī lot of the differences are very subtle, and much less pronounced while doing controls that you'd think. I certainly wouldn't cross it off the list as a option in the near future. They tend to have much cooler toys, get more CAS training trips, and have generally better QOL. I think almost every Marine JTAC has entertained the idea of going AF TACP. Doctrinally, they're a lot more lax when it comes to the discretion they give CAS players on certain things like attack headings, timing, and deconfliction (which are all incredibly important for Marine JTACs to keep restrictive given the way we conduct CAS). I've done plenty of controls alongside both conventional and SOF TACPs, they're a really solid community to work with! Especially personality wise, a lot of them tend to be pretty chill/laidback but unfortunately that same mentality carries over to how they conduct CAS too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |